Perhaps you know of someone who unexpectedly and suddenly died from a heart attack. Did you think that there should have been some kind of sign or symptom before this happened? What about a clue, just to give some chance for prevention before it was too late?

Most people think that routine blood tests, x-ray studies, and routine physical exams are all one needs to find any early signs of a sudden, pending, fatal heart attack. So why do so many of us know someone who passed away suddenly and unexpectedly, despite all these seemingly comforting medical tests?

The answer is unsettling, but it is a fact we must face in order to take a different course and seek a better solution to this problem. The methods used in conventional medicine for “early detection,” are not early enough. Blood tests, blood pressure tests, and other much more expensive tests still do not adequately predict who will have a fatal heart attack, and who will not. It is often said that heart disease is the “silent killer,” because you just can’t tell with standard medical tests, that a person could have a fatal heart attack as their first symptom.

Likewise, mammograms, year after year are not adequate enough to show who has the first developing stages of breast cancer. By the time it is even detectable in mammography, the disease process has been developing for as much as five to ten years!

That’s not acceptable for me, and I hope you will not accept this failed “early detection,” "early diagnosis" system either. The fundamental problem with searching for disease, as a method of “early detection” is that disease must already be present before the search can show anything. Before there are physical changes that will appear on a very insensitive medium such as x-rays (mammography included), the disease process would have already had to develop over the course of many years! The new key would be to probe the body’s innate intelligence and read its hidden language of the keys to optimum health. It would be just like reading an open book—but way before disease were to develop; if only that were possible…

Well I’m here to tell you that it is possible! Now, don’t go and ask the same people who have failed all these years to show you how it is possible, because they just don’t know. If they did, the current unacceptable state of what is called “early detection.” wouldn’t be as it is today. The answer is not to be found in the study of disease, because in true early detection there would not yet be any development of disease—no changes yet in the blood, no masses yet to see on x-ray, no “early stage” symptoms yet, no diagnosis yet—only some, as yet, undefined deviation from optimal health.

At my office in Beverly Hills, our method is to check for optimum health, not a lack of disease. Our method is comfortable, non-invasive, and engages the most sensitive thing we know-of on this planet: your innate sensory abilities and reflexes. It gives clear, consistent results for the hidden starting points—those deviations from optimal. Conventional “early detection” is not enough! Call us today! At my office, we can clearly read these hidden messages for you today, with ease, before they develop into a definable disease, or death.

Barry J. Lieberman, D.C.