A Cure For Cancer?

When it comes to breast cancer, what's all this "racing for the cure?" A cure? Really? Or is it really just racing for the status quo? Cancer research methods are still the same as they have been for over 50 years. Nothing has changed. Did you know that there has been a request to trademark the expression "for the cure," so that nobody else can use it? Is this because running for the cure, the race for the cure, walking for the cure, the war on cancer, and present-day cancer treatment, and cancer fundraising are such huge businesses? Billions of dollars have been donated and spent on cancer research, and yet there is no cure for cancer. Why? Because the cancer research dollars are continually going in the wrong direction. The direction of cancer research depends on the belief systems of whoever is controlling the cancer research money, donated or not. When you donate, albeit with a good heart, they control where the money is spent. It does not go to any truly alternative cancer research. The basics of cancer research: Research always starts with a question to be answered, and ends with the results, but when you start by asking the wrong questions about cancer, you get the wrong results; year after year and decade after decade. Likewise, when you treat the wrong problem, you get the wrong results. Year after year the question is "what is the cure for cancer?" That is the wrong question, and because no one is able to be bold enough to ask the right question, all research money goes in the wrong direction, leading to decades of wasted money, chasing after a misguided and misdirected dream. Imagine if there were a TV news story about people who were dying and that all their digestive tracts were not sterile. The people who have the loudest yappers and just a little knowledge (which is a dangerous thing) would then demand that something must be done! Soon, after the diagnosis is coined, drug companies would follow suit and think-up all these new ways to treat the digestive tract for this condition, and get their new treatments "fast-track approved" by the FDA. All to no avail because the treatment would kill people, but the blame would go to the inability to really keep the digestive tract sterile, not the treatment. Big campaigns are launched. Cries for more research are heard everywhere. Why? Because the problem is getting worse and worse, and the answer could be right around the corner! Soon you would have the war on septic digestive disorder: SDD. Next would be a race for the cure in a town near you. So let me ask you: How do YOU keep your digestive tract sterile? What is your answer? What are you doing to keep your digestive tract sterile? The correct answer is: "That's the wrong question!" The original question is nonsense! But asking that question over and over drives the momentum of the misinformation, especially through the news media, until even you believe it yourself. Do you see how this works? There is no such thing as SDD. Wrong question, wrong cures.

Now that you can see by example how this can take hold, let's get back to the original questions that no one seems to be able to answer, despite billions of dollars of cancer research money. These questions start with the words: "What is the cure for...?" What is the cure for cancer? That's the wrong question! From the wrong question comes the domino effect: wrong question: wrong cancer research: wrong camcer treatment: terrible results. Unacceptable! What about the concept of thinking outside of the box? Well, the question "what is the cure for cancer?" is the most boxed-up thinking around. Just think, over fifty years of misdirected research has failed us, despite the multi-billions of dollars in fundraising, because no one has challenged the initial flawed question. It's time to wake up. Cancer research has to change! Now, knowing that what is off in cancer research and cancer treatment today, ask yourself the following: Do you know someone with cancer who doesn't have a second opinion, or an adjunct care plan, an integrative cancer treatment, supportive alternative, or complementary alternative integrative cancer care besides their conventional cancer care? Are you praying for a speedy recovery for someone who is trapped in the three-sided conventional cancer treatment "box" of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation? Do you think there must be alternative cancer resources, and alternative cancer treatment, but don't know where to look?

There are alternative-thinking doctors who can see the bigger picture of your total level of health, and the dismal limitations of today's conventional cancer treatment. I happen to be one of them, and I'm bold enough to tell you. If you want a true alternative doctor, second opinion, or adjunct care, or complementary care, you should contact my office today, but let's be clear in advance of your call: we do not have "alternative cancer treatment," as Dr. Burzinsky does, at my Los Angeles area, Beverly Hills location, and nobody but an oncologist (cancer doctor) can say that they "treat cancer," but you can find out more by calling us today.